Congress grills Smithsonian on why it branded Mickey Mouse ‘racist’

A museum head in the congressional hot seat was made to answer for an ideology behind exhibits that prompted the question, “Is Mickey Mouse racist?”

Unlike under President Joe Biden’s administration, where woke was the cause du jour and every aspect became tainted with some flavor of DEI, critical race theory, or some other such shade of Marxism, President Donald Trump has pressed forward with purging the agenda.

Tuesday, following the release of a White House Domestic Policy Council report, Texas Rep. Brandon Gill (R) held the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History Director Anthea Hartig’s feet to the proverbial fire with questions about the institution linking racism with objectivity, politeness, and the beloved cartoon character Mickey Mouse.

“Is Mickey Mouse racist?” the congressman asked her bluntly during a hearing of the House Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency.

After Hartig assured the lawmaker the character is “not racist,” Gill proceeded to detail an exhibit that states how Mickey Mouse is representing “vestiges of longstanding traditions of blackfaced minstrelsy.”

“Would you describe that as racist?” asked the congressman.

“No. The historical trajectory of the origins of Mickey Mouse tied directly-” tried the director as Gill interjected, “So, Mickey Mouse is rooted in racism. Is that your testimony?”

As she deflected back to the minstrelsy, a follow-up question asked if she viewed that as racist, to which Hartig responded, “It had certain obvious racial overtones that have been well-documented.”

Asked if that’s problematic, she went on to assert, “It’s not for me to determine what’s problematic. It’s [to] determine to me what’s accurate.”

Elsewhere in their exchange, Gill called out the Smithsonian’s MASS (Museums as a Site for Social) Action Toolkit and how things like objectivity and politeness are considered defining characteristics of white supremacy.

Hartig deflected, arguing that the Smithsonian was not responsible for developing the toolkit it promoted. However, according to the White House report on “How Ideological Capture at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History Erases Our Heritage,” the toolkit was “co-authored by half a dozen current/former Smithsonian employees.”

The toolkit details, “Diversity educators Kenneth Jones and Tema Okun identify 13 facets of a culture based on white supremacy: perfectionism, sense of urgency, defensiveness, quantity over quality, worship of the written word, paternalism, either/or thinking, power hoarding, fear of open conflict, individualism, progress is bigger/more/ objectivity, and the right to comfort.”

ADVERTISEMENT

On objectivity, it states, “This encompasses repressing emotions in decision-making or group processes, thinking in a linear fashion, impatience with those who do not exhibit linear thinking or with thinking that does not appear logical.”

After insisting museum staff “have always inserted their worldview into their work,” the toolkit goes on to argue, “Museum staff have never been objective, but because dominant norms typically coincide with the worldview of the vast majority of museum staff, it has appeared to be objective to the dominant culture. Those with worldviews outside of the dominant culture are hyperaware of the fallacy in this pretense of museum objectivity.”

The viral moment earned both praise for Gill and derision for Hartig and what she represents, with many calling for stripped funding and the termination of radicals.

DONATE TO BIZPAC REVIEW

Please help us! If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to BPR to help us fight them. Now is the time. Truth has never been more critical!

Success! Thank you for donating. Please share BPR content to help combat the lies.

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

BPR INSIDER COMMENTS

Scroll down for non-member comments or join our insider conversations by becoming a member. We'd love to have you!

Leave a Reply

Latest Articles